IBD (Investor’s Business Daily) Article
Article Title: "Class Warfare "
Section: Issues & Insights
Date: 7/7/2005
Education Reform: The success of Ohio's voucher program will give more
parents the same opportunity to choose their children's school that
public school teachers enjoy for themselves.
In 2002, in what may yet be the most important school court case since
Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that
Cleveland's school voucher program, which includes religious schools,
did not violate the separation of church and state.
Based on its success, Ohio will more than triple the size of its school
voucher program, making it the largest such program in the nation. The
state budget signed by Republican Gov. Robert Taft will expand the
tuition aid available in Cleveland since 1996 and allow up to 14,000
additional children statewide to leave public schools that have
persistently failed academic tests and move to private schools.
Cleveland's choice program was created after Ohio's government declared
the city's schools an "academic emergency" in which they flunked 27 out
of 27 state standards for educational performance. Cleveland's
graduation rate was only 28%, one of the worst in the nation.
After just two years of this program, students in Cleveland's
participating private schools scored 7 percentile points higher than
the national average in reading and 15 points higher in math.
Only Florida and Wisconsin currently offer voucher programs similar to
Ohio's. In Florida, the usual suspects - the teachers unions, the ACLU
and People for the American Way - have filed suit in a case in which
the infamous Florida Supreme Court may decide the programs for minority
children.
Florida's Opportunity Scholarship Program, begun under Republican Gov.
Jeb Bush in 1999, now serves only 750 students.
But it has demonstrated what a little competition introduced into the
public school monopoly can accomplish.
Under threat of school vouchers, nearly half of Florida's public
schools now earn A grades under tougher state standards than when a
similar percentage was earning C grades when the program began.
Hispanic third-graders reading at or above grade level has climbed to
61% from 46%. Blacks have jumped to 52% from 36%.
Perhaps the best indicator that public schools need a healthy dose of
competition is where teachers, whose unions oppose vouchers and school
choice, send their children. An analysis of 2000 Census data by the
Fordham Institute showed that 21.5% of public school teachers
nationwide choose private schooling for their children vs. 17.5% for
other families.
The percentage goes up in major urban school systems such as
Philadelphia, Cincinnati and Chicago.
"Public school teachers are savvy education consumers," observes
Chester Finn, president of the Fordham Institute, an Ohio-based
non-profit organization devoted to K-12 education reform. "They know
which schools do a good job and which ones don't."
Rodney Paige, former U.S. secretary of education and superintendent in
the Houston public school system, recognized that competition, not just
money, breeds excellence. "What motivation do public school
administrators have for improvement without competition?" he once
asked. "But if parents can take their children somewhere else to learn,
now administrators are going to get off their butts and make sure
things are done right."
Those who argue that vouchers drain needed resources from public
schools miss the point. If a child is doing well in a school, no
responsible parent will take that child out. The child trapped in a
failing school is already being left behind.
We need to be less concerned with saving the public schools and more
concerned with saving the children in them.
return